Our Case Results

Client charged with stalking and violating a protective order, concerned about job prospects and security clearance. After discussions with prosecutor, Attorney proposed a civil protective order. All criminal charges were eventually nolle prossed (dropped) and later expunged from the record.

Client faced multiple charges of aiding in prostitution. Concerned about their business being shut down and spouse knowing about the charges. Rather than risk trial, Attorney scheduled a meeting with prosecutor and detective to discuss case details. All charges were nolle prossed (dropped) and later expunged.

Client was charged criminally by a businessman for Client’s negative online review of a business – the charge accused her of disrupting said business. After speaking with the client, the Attorney researched & developed a defense based on First Amendment free speech under U.S. Constitution (and a person’s opinion is not defamatory). Prosecution agreed with the argument that online reviews were a protected under Client’s 1st Amendment right, and the criminal charge was nolle prossed (dropped).

Client father was accused by his ex of assaulting their teenager (domestic assault Code 18.2-57.2 because involving a family member) during a custody exchange, putting his career and security clearance in jeopardy. Attorney extensively investigated the teenager’s mental health & credibility issues, and also advised the client to take some educational classes on parenting and anger management. After explaining the mental health background to the prosecutor, as well as mitigation, the domestic A&B was nolle prossed, and later expunged (arrest records were sealed). Attorney also drafted a detailed letter for Client’s employer, so that Client was able to maintain security clearance.

Client was charged with assault and battery on a family member and had a protective order entered against him. As a retired military officer, Client was concerned about having a domestic violence charge on his record and how that might affect future employment opportunities.

Attorney contacted the prosecution and secured Client’s placement in an early diversion program. Client completed a 16-hour parenting stability program as required.

Upon successful completion of the early diversion program, the charge was nolle prossed and was subsequently expunged. 

Attorney advised Client to compile and provide all records of his communications with the woman involved.  Attorney researched the actual subjects of the investigation, the prostitutes.

The prosecution agreed to allow Client to enter an Alford plea with no objection to the Commonwealth’s proffer of facts, pursuant to Virginia Code § 19.2-298.02. The matter was eventually dismissed, which protected Client’s lawful status. 

Attorney asked Client to identify all witnesses and to obtain records — including a timestamped call to order a pizza — demonstrating she was not in the location described when the alleged incident occurred. Attorney and an investigator personally met with and interviewed each witness.

The case proceeded to trial and the Court dismissed the Protective Order, finding that the Client did not commit the violent acts alleged. After review of the trial, the Police decided not to bring any criminal charges against the Client.

Client faced two charges of rape and one charge of forcible sodomy of a minor. He feared spending the rest of his life in prison.

Attorney advised Client to undergo a psychosexual evaluation and begin sex offender treatment.. Attorney also coordinated character letters from family members and friends to present Client’s background and advocate for fair treatment.  She wrote a comprehensive sentencing memo for the Court.

Two of the three charges were dropped. Client was sentenced to a sentence that was significantly lighter than what the prosecutor wanted and the sentencing guidelines called for.  

Attorney subpoenaed the Department of Forensic Science technician responsible for the breathalyzer machine used in Client’s case. A full review of the prosecution’s discovery revealed significant evidentiary challenges.

The DWI charge was amended to reckless driving — general, with only a six-month loss of driving privileges.

Client was accused of aggravated sexual battery and taking indecent liberties with his minor daughter. Client denied all allegations and was deeply concerned about remaining in jail and being unable to provide for his family.

Attorney spoke with Client’s wife to gather additional context, visited Client’s home, and interviewed his daughters. Attorney reviewed all discovery materials and identified substantial evidentiary weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.

Both charges were dismissed by order of nolle prosequi due to insufficient evidence. The Commonwealth also filed motions to nonsuit both related Protective Orders.

Client was notified of an outstanding arrest warrant. Upon turning himself in, Client learned he was accused of assault and battery. The pending charge was actively affecting his ability to obtain employment.

Attorney reviewed all discovery evidence and identified weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. 

The Commonwealth agreed to nolle pros (drop) the charge due to insufficient evidence. The charge is eligible for expungement.